Hmmm, then obviously you haven't seen the VL0LD QSLs
from <http://www.eQSL.cc>www.eQSL.cc for six meters that are signed by
Romeo! In its current incarnation it is quite insecure. I'm a security guy
- its my job. Right now its a *great* way to exchange QSL images (thats
pretty pictures boys and girls), but not confirm QSOs.
For the record, I *like* paper QSLs, AND am looking forward to the
generally accepted and secure eQSL system which should exist in the next
year or so, whether its from the ARRL, <http://www.eQSL.cc>www.eQSL.cc, or
anyone else.
Paper QSLs for the wall, eQSLs for confirmation
73
Ted, KR1G
PS: Money from controlling QSLing??? I don't get it? I'm sure some QSL
managers make a little, but most lose.
>4) The claims that the eQSL process is flawed and does not secure the
>delivery and receipt of "confirmation reports" is simply smoke to disquise
>the real intent of the ARRL--fees my friends. Money talks bull_ _ _ _
>walks!
>
----------
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
<http://explorer.msn.com>http://explorer.msn.com
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|