Steve,
Quoting you from another thread, do you have facts to back that up?
I've always had the impression (mine and others) that CQ isn't worth the
paper it's printed on, and the only reason it survives is the contest
results.
73,
Barry
On 12 Jan 2002 K7LXC@aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 1/12/02 5:16:36 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> gm3poi@btinternet.com writes:
>
> > If CQ Magazine get there act together they could effectively poach the 3
> > main ARRL contests with a promise to publish the result in CQ. But are
> they
> > shrewd enough to see an opportunity.
>
> Shrewd? I don't think that's a term that's ever been used to describe
> anyone in the amateur radio publishing business.
>
> I'll just throw this on the fire. CQ magazine reluctantly publishes
> contest scores because they take up so much room in the magazine (it costs
> money). The contest results issues are the least liked by the majority of CQ
> subscribers and have the lowest monthly sales so there's not much incentive
> for ANY magazine to put them in their magazine. CQ would love to abandon
> publishing contest scores just like the ARRL would like to do.
>
> And I don't think it's necessary to cross-post everyone that's made a
> comment on this discussion that's from the League and doesn't subscribe to
> cq-contest. Please check the addressees before hitting the 'send' button.
>
> Cheers,
> Steve K7LXC
>
>
> --
> CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
>
--
Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@mindspring.com
Newtown, PA Frankford Radio Club
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|