To: | Tonno Vahk <tonno.vahk@mail.ee> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ pattern in contest - what's your vote? |
From: | Ron Feutz <feutz@wctc.net> |
Date: | Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:33:21 -0600 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Tonno, I am an average CW contester as far as speed goes. I am comfortable up to 35 WPM for easy-to-copy calls and exchanges. My problem is with difficult calls at high speeds. When tuning I frequently don't focus fast enough on a call to get it the first time when "test" is at the end. So I prefer "test" at the beginning, to trigger my brain into focus. Something I noticed this year is that some high speed stations programmed the call at a slower speed than the CQ or "test". I think this helps everyone's rate, especially later in the contest when all the real fast CW ops have worked each other. I suspect most top-notch ops will agree with your opinion. 73, Ron - WA9IRV
_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | RE: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW writeup, Dick Green WC1M |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] K4OJ recognition, Georgek5kg |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] CQ pattern in contest - what's your vote?, Tonno Vahk |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ pattern in contest - what's your vote?, Craig Cook |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |