Over many hours of operating CW contests, I find
that if a station sends 'TEST DE <their call>' or
'TEST <their call> it works well.
1 - It gives my brain a chance to 'sync-up' to
the signal - especially if I'm S&Ping and I just
come across your call.
2 - MOST folks are accustomed to hearing 'TEST'
followed by a callsign. In other words.. it's
expected and therefore, easier to be sync'd up to
copy.
3 - When I hear 'TEST' I *KNOW* the station is
looking for a QSO and NOT involved in either
completing an exchange, or initiating an
exchange.
It is clear and unambigiuos.
4 - at 'contest speeds' it takes VERY little time
to send and even over 48 hours is not going to
make a hill of beans difference in terms of time
freed up for other 'things'.
5 - It's a pretty standardized routine to hear
the invitation part of the call (i.e. 'CQ',
'Test', 'QRZ?' BEFORE the callsign. Doing it
backwards, is well, backwards.
73
Chuck K3FT
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail.
http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
---------------------------------------------------------------
The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|