Hans,
Is it reckless? Sorry I dont see it that way.
These are the stated facts.
As I see it, facts has just been prestented and
no judgement has been done.
1. IV3HAX/IU3X connects to a internet cluster from
a Cape Verde provider and spots D44TD. This is
clearly proven.
2. IV3TAN admits in a letter that IV3HAX was with him
at D44TD site, also facts since IV3TAN did admit
to it.
Up to the contest sponsors to judge how serious the
violation is, if it is a violation that is.
In my own point of view it doesnt look serious at all
and ofcourse I agree with IV3TAN that those 6 spots
didnt matter at all.
In the heath of the battle misstakes do happen, we
are only but humans.
73 Jim SM2EKM
------------------------------------------------------
K0HB wrote:
[Original Message]
From: Alberto Annesi <a.annesi@libero.it>
i'm just come back home from Cape Verde and
i'm very surprised to see that there are some "comments"
about my operations and about who spotted me
on the cluster network.
It's a sad commentary that circumstances force you to defend your
reputation against thinly-investigated public innuendo.
Recklessly splashing the reflectors with "I wonder about this guy"
jeremiads is so much easier than ferreting out the facts before you stain
some ones good name.
73, de Hans, K0HB
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|