Re: [CQ-Contest] Operator Error

["Dennis Younker" <SunGodX@cox.net>]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Coleman" <aa4lr@arrl.net>
To: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>
Cc: "Cq-Contest Reflector" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Operator Error


> On Nov 10, 2004, at 12:51 PM, Ken Widelitz wrote:
>
> > With regard to the inconsistent sending of precedence, checks and 
> > sections,
> > my understanding is that the log checking software is smart enough to 
> > flag
> > such stations' exchange as "unstable." Receiving stations are not 
> > penalized
> > in that situation.
> >
> > With regard to how "unstable" numbers are treated, N6TR, who developed 
> > the
> > log checking software, would need to address the issue. I would suggest
> > sending in your log with a notation that errors were made in the 
> > numbers
> > that were sent.
>
> Since the cabrillo format fully specifies the exchanges that were sent 
> and received, so long as they are correct, it shouldn't be a problem, 
> right? I mean, if the exchange sent actually matches what was sent, 
> then shouldn't the log checking software be able to check against it?
>
>
> Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL        Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net

That's just it.  He sent something other than he logged.

--Dennis
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest