CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Another gratuitous SS-CW trick

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Another gratuitous SS-CW trick
From: Ben Coleman NJ8J <nj8j@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 20:01:51 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Eric Hilding wrote:
| Confusion & conflict result from poorly written rules or the absence of
| clarity (like most software "Help" files).  That's one reason there are
| usually three versions of any rules in a Courtroom:
|
| 1. The actual rules
| 2. What the Plantiff's attorney says the rules mean
| 3. What the Defendant's attorney says the rules mean

You forgot the fourth: what the judge says the rules mean.  Not to
mention, on occasion, what the appellate judge says the rules should
have meant.

Ben
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBoTp/RgRgmxNburQRAoYuAJ9SK5EkDxVHazunClAcLba0G3aXrgCePl0T
OF2bqHbfnvufUglNd9WtoS0=
=ZxGd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>