CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules and the District of Columbia

To: <Jimk8mr@aol.com>, <k4ik@subich.com>, <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules and the District of Columbia
From: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 21:29:18 +0600
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
"...A man is an island.. "
May be counting every participant as  a separate multiplier is not so
moot approach after all :)
Sorry, just could not resist... It so much resembles the discussions
in Russian contest reflector...

73, Igor UA9CDC


>
> In a message dated 6/1/05 8:14:01 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
k4ik@subich.com
> writes:
>
> Again,  if DC is a multiplier every Indian reservation, national
park,
> monument  and federal facility should be a separate multiplier.
They
> certainly  have the same "status."  This applies to ALL contests.
>
>
>
>
>
> A simple test for any of those places would be:  "Who does a
resident  vote
> for in a U.S. Senatorial election?"
>
> For anywhere in the 48 contiguous states, Alaska, or Hawaii, the
answer is
> pretty clear.  Not so for DC.
>
>
> 73  -  Jim  K8MR
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>