CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] RES: RES: M/2 Rule

To: "K4RO Kirk Pickering" <k4ro@k4ro.net>,<cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RES: RES: M/2 Rule
From: "Stuart Santelmann KC1F" <kc1f@adelphia.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 22:16:55 -0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
You should have made a tape !  Or a .WAV file, then email it to the League.

        Stu        KC1F


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "K4RO Kirk Pickering" <k4ro@k4ro.net>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RES: RES: M/2 Rule


> On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 06:36:09AM -0300, PY5EG wrote:
> > In my personal opinion the lock out is the only real way to prevent the
> > break in the rules specially in big MM stations when operating as M/2.
> 
> I agree with Oms.
> 
> Unfortunately, it's apparently OK to violate this rule,
> at least in phone SS. Last year, several stations reported 
> hearing the winning multi-op simultaneously on more than 
> one band. We could hear the other ops shouting out reports
> from other operating positions while we copied our own.
> They could also be heard on two receivers on two different
> bands simultaneously.  
> 
> If they had a lock-out, it wasn't working properly. It may 
> have been a mistake, but it happened repeatedly. They were 
> not DQ'ed, and instead were rewarded with the winning trophy.
> I guess we'll have to configure for multi-multi this year
> if we want to compete in phone SS.
> 
> -Kirk  K4RO
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>