CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] UBN/Log disclosure (was: Re: RES: D4B QRT)

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] UBN/Log disclosure (was: Re: RES: D4B QRT)
From: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 09:11:59 +0300
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Good European Morning,

I was guessing my idea would be miscopied, but I sent the message as it was.


I rephrashe:
I am sure the assisted category will vanish by merging into single op category 
as the 'assisted' just does not work as it should. Assisted is kind-of 
'fabricated' operating class.

My view of the future top contests is the use of spotting networks is allowed, 
but the operator has to do all work her/himself to get the QSOs in the log.

Single ops of the world will unite in one category.

There is a lingual image trying to transfer the message assisted is history, 
make only one single op category.


73,
Jukka OH6LI



>-----Original Message-----
>From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com 
>[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of ext Mark Bailey
...
>In some contests, I enjoy competing without using the packet 
>clusters.  I do not support removing my ability to do that and 
>to compete with stations who are also not using the packet cluster.
>
>I am not in favor of eliminating the single operator 
>categories from the contests that I operate.  Or, were you 
>advocating eliminating the use of packet clusters altogether 
>by eliminating the existing "assisted" categories and making 
>all assisted stations multi-operator again?  I also do not 
>support that.
>
>Perhaps you wish to remove low power and QRP categories as well?
>The same argument seems to apply...in fact, we also need to 
>remove the rules about obeying the terms of our licenses for 
>power output since that is also unenforceable.  :-)
>
>73,
>
>Mark, KD4D
>
>jukka.klemola@nokia.com wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> -----Original Message----- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com  
>>> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of ext Braco 
>>> OE1EMS
>> 
>> ...
>> 
>>> if you ask me i will remove unassisted category beacuse it´s
>> 
>> 
...
>> Assisted category is history already now, whether the 
>contest sponsors 
>> publicly admit that or not.
>> 
>> Some contests show that now. They are the pioneers.
>> 
>> In my opinion the spotting system User Interface better be really 
>> flawless, or it will slow the operator down and thus reduce 
>the score.
>> 
>> 
>> 73 Jukka OH6LI
>>
 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>