I'm aware of that. The point I was rebutting was the
claim that intracountry QSOs are not permitted in
CQWW. As I said, they most certainly are allowed.
73 Rich NN3W
--- Original Message ---
From: "john devoldere, ON4UN"
<john.devoldere@telenet.be>
To: "'Richard DiDonna NN3W'" <NN3W@prodigy.net>
CC: CQ-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 160 window in ARRL 160m
contest,
>There are large countries (geographically spoken) and
small ones. OK?
>Situation is very different. Contests are not only
gfor US hams to enjoy,
>hi..
>73
>John, ON4UN
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
>[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf
Of Richard DiDonna NN3W
>Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 8:21 PM
>To: ve3zi@rac.ca; Contest
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 160 window in ARRL 160m
contest,
>
>
>--- Original Message ---
>From: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>
>To: Contest <CQ-contest@contesting.com>
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 160 window in ARRL 160m
>contest,
>
>SNIP
>>
>>Other contests: The situation varies considerably. In
>>CQWW, for example, own country contacts are not
>>permitted. Therefore a DX window is not necessary.
>>
>This part is entirely incorrect. In CQWW, contacts
>within the same country are certainly permitted. You
>just don't get point credit for it. OTOH, you do get
>multiplier credit (country and zone, as applicable).
>
>We've been discussing this very topic now for the
>better part of a week.
>
>73 Rich NN3W
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-
contest
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-
contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|