I said, I'll operate
>the four middle bands, why don't you do a 10M/160M single op effort?
> (Normally, one of the five radio positions is 10M/160M) As the
>contest wore on, Mark, in his part time effort, made 200 Qs on 10M
>and 160M, with many stations telling him he was the only signal on
>either band. At times, I could see that he was having a run on 160M.
> I have to think that his effort sparked a lot of 160M activity in SS
>this year.
>
>>Why even bother to carry this band as a usable band in SS?
>
> It's available for you to use. Whether you use it or not, is a
>strategic decision that you have to make in SS.
>
Hi, Ed.
That's pretty cool.
I noticed there were a lot more QSO's made duirng SS SSB; nothing in
the three-digit range, but at least something and most of it east of
the Mississippi.
I just knee-jerked my query onto the reflector after seeing only 1
160m Q being reported on the 3830 summary for SS CW. :-) It just
looked so very lonely in the column of 0's.
73,
dale, kg5u
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|