CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Why 160m in SS?

To: Dale Martin <kg5u@hal-pc.org>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Why 160m in SS?
From: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:57:19 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Dec 19, 2005, at 7:47 PM, Dale Martin wrote:

> Why is there a 160m band category (?) in SS CW/SSB?
>
> In looking over the 3830 band summary for 2005 SS CW, out of 423  
> submitted
> reports, there's only one station reporting making as many as 1 QSO  
> on 160.
>
> Why even bother to carry this band as a usable band in SS?

There's a few people who work several Qs on this band.

W4AN used to say, "if you are working 160m in SS, you are losing."

Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL        Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net
Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
             -- Wilbur Wright, 1901

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>