CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Why 160m in SS?

To: "'Lee Hiers'" <lee.hiers@gmail.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Why 160m in SS?
From: "Randy Thompson" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 04:19:34 -0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
That comment was referring to working stations in WPX!  But, you could make
a similar remark for SS.  Although in SS Phone, where I was QRP, I worked a
number of stations on 160.

Randy, K5ZD 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com 
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Lee Hiers
> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 5:15 AM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Why 160m in SS?
> 
> Wasn't it K5ZD that said (regarding SS) "if I'm on 160, I'm losing"?
> 
> --
> Lee Hiers, AA4GA
> "Have Dobro Will Travel"
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>