Alright, but the other ham should also not assume that I send out
QSLs just for the fun of it.
Call me an old grump if you like, but I resent this pressure put on
us hams mostly by the ARRL to send QSLs willy-nilly all over the
world. "A QSL is the final courtesy of a QSO". Says who? If someone
buys into that, fine, and if not, that's fine too. I can be talked
into things, but I'll be darned if I will be pressured against my will.
So there. Back to non-grump :-) mode.
73, Bill W6WRT
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
At 06:12 AM 1/5/2006, Richard DiDonna NN3W wrote:
>I'm sorry, but I disagree highly with this practice.
>Perhaps the ham is rebuilding his QSL collection or
>has moved to a new state or province and is resetting
>his counters at zero. You don't know, and you
>shouldn't assume what the motivations are of another
>person who requests a QSL.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|