CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] LOTW User Update

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] LOTW User Update
From: "Simon Brown (HB9DRV)" <simon@hb9drv.ch>
Reply-to: "Simon Brown (HB9DRV)" <simon@hb9drv.ch>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:06:15 +0100
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
This is my option, I consider myself to be a professional software engineer.
---
The LOTW developers are more interested in technology than developing 
user-friendly software.

Given the wealth of programming expertise the ARRL can draw on LOTW is so 
far nothing to be proud of. It could be far better, however few commercial 
organisations in the Ham arena produce high-quality programs so LOTW hardly 
has high standards to meet.

$ set rant/off

Simon Brown
---
http://blog.hb9drv.ch/

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <RLVZ@aol.com>


>
> I can certainly see where only 1/3 of the ARRL Officials are using  LOTW.
> It's not used friendly and too difficult to install and  maintain.  The 
> ARRL is
> overly concerned about QSL security.
> 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>