Good question, I would like to know that too. The revision history
(http://www.kkn.net/~trey/cabrillo/updates.txt) mentions a request to
support unclaimed QSOs but it looks like is not part of the current specs:
"2002-10-15 Unclaimed QSO support requested by DL6RAI and DL8WPX/YB1AQS but
deferred until XML version of Cabrillo."
We are not talking about the "feature" of unclaiming QSOs in one of the
loggers are we?
73,
Julio VE3FH
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
To: "reflector cq-contest" <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Wed 26-Jul-2006 18:28
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Cheating by M/S - 3 QSO "penalty" by K3BU
> How do you 'zero point' a contact in a Cabrillo log?
>
>
> David Robbins K1TTT
> e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
> web: http://www.k1ttt.net
> AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-
> > bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Gord Kosmenko
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 18:22
> > To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> > Subject: [CQ-Contest] Cheating by M/S - 3 QSO "penalty" by K3BU
> >
> >
> > There is a solution or fix to this situation, as an active M/S we
practice
> > the following,
> > if the op violates the 10 minute rule by working any station, we "zero
> > point" the QSO.
> > The contact still reminds in the log - for log checking purposes.
> > Especially for the
> > other guy not to get a "not-in-the-log" action by the checkers.
> >
> > There are solutions to many of the logging problems discussed lately
which
> > can be
> > solved or handled by operator contest knowledge, experience and
expertise.
> >
> > 73, Gord VE6SV
> >
> >
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|