CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Packet Posts

To: "CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Packet Posts
From: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:01:03 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
H all

I noticed one thing, some spots had 'new' next to them.  I checked and it 
seems as though I had already worked that section.  If a spot says 'new' 
does that mean it is a new mult, or just a new spot.  Thanks and 73
Tom W7WHY



>
> In a message dated 11/7/2006 12:29:39 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> dx35@hilding.com writes:
>
> Above  all...PLEASE...INCLUDE THE MULT ID WITH EVERY PACKET POST. 
> {Emphasis
> Added/CAPS}
>
>
>
> I strongly disagree on two counts:
>
> 1.) The mult id does not show up on the band map and, therefore, the
> callsign is not highlighted as a needed mult...at least this is the way 
> WriteLog
> handles the spot...and
>
> 2.) I believe that the operator should be required to copy the Section  id 
> as
> part of the exchange.  Otherwise why not also include the PREC and CK  in 
> the
> packet info?  Then the operator only must copy the serial  number!
>
> IMHO.
>
> 73, Geo...k5kg
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>