| To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Check in SS |
| From: | "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net> |
| Date: | Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:30:20 -0600 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
>That's *you*, NOT the station. So, according to the rules, it always has been legal for a multi-op station to change Check as operators change. In fact, it's mandatory, per the rule. So you change the check with operator but use the station call sign? 73, Keith NM5G _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Easy way to correct answer, Mike K9MI |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] why Unlimited [aka Assisted]?, Steve.Root@culligan.com |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Check in SS, Rex Maner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Check in SS, Kelly Taylor |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |