Randy, congrats on the live audio that you put in your web, and congrats in
your great home page too.!
I respectfully disagree with those twisted minded thoughts that allways see
technology as a thing to battle against.
BTW, You know, I usually read those "recomendations" about packet abuse in
the printed results of cqww, and I see year arter years those guys that right
after a spot is fed into the packet clusters they show up in milliseconds in
the freq. of the DX station and they still claim to be Single Op. They are not
being disqualified nor anything.
Amaizing was a line that goes something like....We know what is possible and
what is not to detect cheaters! That cannot be done! Even less based in what is
possible and what is not! It is am almost invisible line..
C'mon guys would you tell me that anybody could have thought that N5TJ was
going to make a score even higher than the best MS in terms of what is possible
and what is not...I was the only one who predicted Jeff's socres. Not even him
thought he could make over 17 M in the CW contest.
My point is that I really hope that this hole thing stop! And it will only
DO, if we stop fighting against technology.
73, Martin LU5DX
2006 CQ WW DX CW SOAB Assisted at LU4DX
Martin, LU5DX
http://360.yahoo.com/lu5dx
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LU-CG/
http://www.lucg.com.ar
http://www.n1mm.com
http://www.bavarian-contest-club.de/contest/ped/highscore.php
http://www.rufzxp.net/toplist.htm
---------------------------------
Access over 1 million songs - Yahoo! Music Unlimited.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|