CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted - still trying to get it right

To: ke1fo@arrl.net, kr2q@optonline.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted - still trying to get it right
From: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: k-zero-hb@earthlink.net
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:27:29 -0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
> [Original Message]
> From: Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO) <afrugoli@verizon.net>
>
> Part of this whole dilemma comes down to enforcement.  There is little 
> or no way to enforce the rules in the case of information being passed 
> on 20M during a qso, someone pulling up to date propagation information 
> off the web or from WWV, or the operator's neighbor ham stopping by and 
> commenting that 10 was open when he left home - short of having a human 
> referee at every station and listening constantly. 

No polite way for me to break this news to you.  If you believe that >any<
of those examples should place your entry in "Assisted" or "Multi-Op", then
you are one of less than a dozen people on the planet holding that view.  

73 es beep beep,

de Hans, K0HB
--
 ><{{{{*>    http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb  



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>