To: | "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>, <ve3zi@rac.ca>,"'CQ-Contest Reflector'" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP SSB 160m |
From: | "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com> |
Reply-to: | John Vickers <wa4tt@nlamerica.com> |
Date: | Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:36:14 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
----- Original Message ----- From: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com> > > A few hours of intense activity should easily be tolerated. > Just one guys opinion. Unless that intense activity is right on top of the VU7 I've been trying to work all week ! There was also a CW contest going on down there. Antenna bandwidth can be handled in a number of ways--- unless its a major contest--- phone should be done above 1840 kc. 73, WA4TT---------ps: got'em despite the noise ! _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP SSB 160m, Shelby Summerville |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] 2007 NAQP SSB - All 3830 Claimed Scores 21Jan2007, mwdink |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP SSB 160m, W0MU Mike Fatchett |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP SSB 160m, Mark Steven Williams |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |