The League isn't going to change the rules because the League just doesn't
see this as an issue worth spending an iota of time worrying about.
Neither do I.
Next subject please. And let's make it something WORTH discussing.
73, kelly
ve4xt
----- Original Message -----
From: "K6VVA LQP HQ" <dx35@hilding.com>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Annoying Trend
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, John W5TD, wrote:
>
> > Then why not state in the rules:
> >
> > Check (the last two digits made up at random)
> >
> > It seems pretty straightforward what the check is. I
> > cannot see why some people are so resistant to
> > sending the correct thing.
>
> I cannot see why the ARRL is "so resistant" to revising the rules to read
> either:
>
> 1. "You may use any CK other than your actual first year licensed"; OR,
>
> 2. "If you use any CK other than your actual first year licensed, your log
> will be considered null and void."
>
> This is really a no brainer and all future discussions on this matter can
> be eliminated, ***IF*** the ARRL takes the requisite action to amend the
> rules and ***ENFORCE*** #2 above if that is the option they roll with.
>
> Another option, of course, is to axe CK from the exchange.
>
> 73...
>
> Rick, K6VVA
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|