So, it's not good enough that others are altruistically doing your
work for you, it's important that they do near-perfect work for you, and
if they don't, we should "expose" them and start humiliating them in public?
Did I get that right?
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 10:53:21AM -0500, Jim Idelson wrote:
> Ok, Dave. This is great stuff. But, now that you have almost completely
> eradicated malicious spotting from our world, you need a new challenge.
>
> Almost as detrimental as self-spotting, busted spotting is the next big
> problem to deal with. Guys who can't copy and can't type should not be
> passing their errors on to the rest of the world. So, how about some
> post-contest comparisons of spotted calls against the SCP database? For those
> who have posted 50 or more spots during the contest, what percent appear to
> be busted calls? Listed from highest percent to lowest, that would be a good
> way to expose the worst and the best!
>
> Going a step further, when we see SO2R repeatedly spotted as S02R on or near
> 14.027, can we figure out who first posted the bad call, and then identify
> those who in all likelihood blindly picked up the spot and propagated it
> further?
>
> 73,
>
> Jim Idelson K1IR
> email k1ir at designet.com
> web http://www.k1ir.com
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
--
Kenneth E. Harker WM5R
kenharker@kenharker.com
http://www.kenharker.com/
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|