To: | "'Richard DiDonna NN3W'" <nn3w@cox.net>,<cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL REPLY - Remote Site & Contesting Rules |
From: | "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com> |
Date: | Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:04:44 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
NN3W writes: > My question is whether this gives implied consent to remote > operation from locations other than the DXCC entity where the > operator is physically located? The DXCC awards desk certainly > doesn't think so. For many of the more rare DXCC entities the DXCC desk requires documentation that the operator was actually in the entity - usually stamped passport and "landing permits." It would be rather difficult to provide those documents for a remote operation! 73, ... Joe, W4TV _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Ontario QSO Party - One Month Away!, Bob Nash VE3KZ |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO, Herbert Schoenbohm |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL REPLY - Remote Site & Contesting Rules, Richard DiDonna NN3W |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL REPLY - Remote Site & Contesting Rules, Paul J. Piercey |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |