Hi Joe,
That's interesting. Why is it only the rare ones? Shouldn't it apply to all
entities?
73 -- Paul VO1HE
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Joe
> Subich, W4TV
> Sent: March 21, 2007 14:05
> To: 'Richard DiDonna NN3W'; cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL REPLY - Remote Site & Contesting Rules
>
>
> NN3W writes:
>
> > My question is whether this gives implied consent to remote
> operation
> > from locations other than the DXCC entity where the operator is
> > physically located? The DXCC awards desk certainly doesn't
> think so.
>
> For many of the more rare DXCC entities the DXCC desk
> requires documentation that the operator was actually in the
> entity - usually stamped passport and "landing permits." It
> would be rather difficult to provide those documents for a
> remote operation!
>
> 73,
>
> ... Joe, W4TV
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|