CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] No more JAs

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] No more JAs
From: "Frank Hunt" <zl2br@ihug.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:14:40 +1200
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Here are some interesting statistics taken from the JARL All-Asian
Contest web site - numbers of participants (CW and Phone logs
received) for the past few years:

Year            JA              EU              NA
1996            457             270             34
1997            575             341             52
1998            647             385             62
1999            680             452             49
2000            859             431             63
2001            695             513             88
2002            733             469             98
2003            812             482             85
2004            696             533             79
2005            624             518             70
2006            727             521             57

Make of these figures what you like. Yes, I realise these are only
logs received and not numbers of all stations active, but I believe 
it
shows that the more serious JA contesters are still active, at least
in contests where they "hold center stage". Maybe in the other
contests where they don't hold center stage, such as the CQ type
contests, some of these more JA serious contesters and many casual JA
contesters really did get bored with being "cannon fodder".

I reckon the JA's would really appreciate it, if a lot more non-Asian
stations especially from NA, participated in the next AA contest and
took a turn at being the cannon fodder :-)

73, Frank ZL2BR

> 
> One hypothesis put forth is that the JAs got bored with being
> "cannon fodder" for the West Coast big guns.  Another theory is that
> as crowding the big JA cities got worse, fewer JAs could put up
> antennas for HF.  Perhaps the lure of cell phones and computers
> pulled the JA techno-hobbyist away from ham radio.  Take your pick.
> 
> I doubt there is any easy fix for this, unless we can make HF ham
> radio attractive to these people again.
> 
> For many years, we all waited for a huge explosion of BY hams as
> China became a more open society.  That hasn't worked to any great
> extent either...
> 
> 
> 73,
> 
> Dave/K8CC
> 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>