Like John said, the W3NQN filters are the top of the pile. I've done
some measurements with a network analyzer (HP 8753D) comparing the
three different kinds. I can summarize them like this:
W3NQN > Dunestar > I.C.E.
I only had access to a few of the filters when I did this. I have a
plot comparing the several Dunestar and I.C.E. filters to a modified
W3NQN design provided to me by N0FP on my web site:
http://www.k8gu.com/compare.pdf
I want to say that I've heard that someone did a much more thorough
comparison in SMC's Blackhole or the NCJ. But, I've never seen this.
If someone has the reference, I'd like to look it up since I get
questions about homebrewing the W3NQN filters with some frequency.
I built the W3NQN filters from scratch. It's a bit of work. But, it
can be done for about $40/band. (Mine were cheaper because I got the
toroids as engineering samples. Being a grad student does pay-off at
select times.) I used inexpensive high-voltage capacitors from
Digi-Key. These aren't rated for RF service; but, they seem to work
OK. I really do need to go back and evaluate this choice at some
point. The toroids, except for the T130-0, are available from W8DIZ.
You really need to have access to good measurement equipment to do it
right. I built several of them without measuring anything and they
came out a little better than the Dunestars. You can really tweak
them in, though, if you have a network analyzer or even just a regular
antenna analyzer or generator and a peak detector.
73,
--Ethan, K8GU/9.
http://www.k8gu.com/
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|