To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rules - was Check numbers again |
From: | Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net> |
Date: | Thu, 08 Nov 2007 08:24:27 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 22:12:22 -0600, "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com> wrote: > >Your reply has failed to answer my question. ------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------ My reply answered the question fully. Please read it again. If you do not agree with my answer, that is your right. As to "The league has said that they don't care", is that the Board of Directors, the Contest Advisory Committee, or an ARRL employee speaking for himself? 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] SNS, Mike Wetzel |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] TS-440 vs. IC-765 for SS Phone, Rick Mintz |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rules - was Check numbers again, Bill Parry |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rules - was Check numbers again, Robert Naumann |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |