Yeah, there has to be something. Or maybe it's good the way it is.
Maybe I'm just upset that 10M never opened :)
73 -- Paul VO1HE
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Paul T. Antos
> Sent: December 10, 2007 01:54
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] re-newing the 10 meter contest
>
> >From VO1HE....
>
> < As an example, if I worked N2BJ before I worked you, my
> exchange to you
> would be "N7DF GN37 N2BJ".>
>
> Gee, Paul, I dunno... if a fair percentage of the casual
> participants didn't read the rules carefully ( e.g. US
> stations working US zones in CQWW for zero points ad nauseam
> ), I can see where the call signs in their logs are going to
> get screwed up. Not sure what I would send for QSO #1 either.
>
> I had a whole bunch of stuff I was going to write but decided
> to delete it. I'm sure there'll be a passel of neat ideas
> forthcoming. Let's wait and see how the ARRL will go about
> changing this thing... ... ... ...
>
> Paul WB2ABD
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|