While this was sent to me directly, it was anonymous. I doubt Mr. Qwerty
Zxcvbn will object to my forwarding it to the reflector.
I hope this isn?t the ?evidence? as to the ultimate TRUTH we all seek (and
some KNOW.)
73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT
-----Original Message-----
From: qwerty zxcvbn [mailto:cheaterswillnotprevail@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 10:14 AM
To: widelitz@gte.net
Subject: Re: The Cheater returns
There is something about ex-YU
Look at this one:
http://lists.contesting.com/_3830/2000-11/msg01139.html
YT6A now 4O3A
Disqualified, two operators.
Look here Results 2000
http://www.cq-amateur-radio.com/2WW%20CW%20Results%20Sept%202001%20ALL.pdf?b
csi_scan_2C1B62DD9264DD56=0&bcsi_scan_filename=2WW%20CW%20Results%20Sept%202
001%20ALL.pdf
<http://www.cq-amateur-radio.com/2WW%20CW%20Results%20Sept%202001%20ALL.pdf?
bcsi_scan_2C1B62DD9264DD56=0&bcsi_scan_filename=2WW%20CW%20Results%20Sept%20
2001%20ALL.pdf>
Where is the log?
It was submitted to CQ.
Why no mention of disqualification?
On Dec 10, 2007 10:35 AM, qwerty zxcvbn < cheaterswillnotprevail@gmail.com
<mailto:cheaterswillnotprevail@gmail.com> > wrote:
Who is claiming #1 this year?
http://www.radio-sport.net/cqwwcw07_rdp.htm
Who claimed #1 in 2004?
http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/3830/2004-12/msg00589.html
The log was submitted to CQWW
but
What happened to the log?
http://www.cq-amateur-radio.com/1WW%20ResCW2004%20Sep05.pdf
Cheating - too many Multipliers and QSOs - At least another operator
helping.
Why no mention of disqualification in the end?
cheaters will not prevail
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|