CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer
From: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:02:47 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hmm..  This may bring more young people into CW contesting if we 
demonstrate it to them.

73, Jim  VE7FO

Bill Tippett wrote:
> 
>          This may present an interesting dilemma for contest
> sponsors.  Skimmer is pure hardware...no external help from other
> ops.  How could you disallow Skimmer (effectively gleaning spots
> like Packet) and yet allow SO2R?  Both are purely hardware, so
> why allow one and not the other?
> 
>          Another problem is how to police whether spots are
> coming from Skimmer or Packet?  I remember competing
> against a "single op" on 10m who claimed his Sub-RX
> allowed him to have multiplier totals like multi-multis.  ;-)
> Now he could claim he was using Skimmer, which might be
> legal depending on how the sponsors rule on it.
> 
>                                  73,  Bill  W4ZV 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>