CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges

To: n2ic@arrl.net, 'CQ Contest' <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges
From: Alan Leith <aleith@syd.eastlink.ca>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:11:43 -0300
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I'm not involved in the test myself but I have been listening.  I thought,
the first time I heard just a number and no signal report that it was a
mistake.  I've heard just the number given about a half dozen times.  To me,
it is just plain wrong, as well as being against the rules.
Disqualification is in order.

73

Al, VE1AL





-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Steve London
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 2:45 PM
To: CQ Contest
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges

Is anyone else bothered by serious WPX competitors not giving out a signal
report ?

"V. Exchange: RS(T) report plus a progressive contact three-digit serial
number starting with 001 for the first contact."

A short list of those giving out only a serial number, from just a few hours
of
listening:

4O3A
ZW2D
N7DD

73,
Steve, N2IC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>