CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges
From: Mike Tessmer <mtessmer@mindspring.com>
Reply-to: Mike Tessmer <mtessmer@mindspring.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:28:05 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
K8DD wrote:
>When you work them, if they don't give you an RST, ask them for it.


This is exactly what I did when I worked 4O3A Saturday.

And for those who will quibble about whether "59(9)" should be replaced with 
something more "meaningful" - this topic isn't about that so please don't 
hijack the thread.  The rule, as N2IC noted, is the rule.


> "V. Exchange: RS(T) report plus a progressive contact three-digit serial
> number starting with 001 for the first contact."



73, Mike K9NW




_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>