| To: | "'Joe Subich, W4TV'" <w4tv@subich.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer |
| From: | "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com> |
| Reply-to: | w0yk@msn.com |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:52:16 -0700 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> etc.) or more accurate ("history files," SCP databases, etc.
> produced by other individuals). Once could easily argue that
> history files - since they relieve the operator of the need
> to copy the exchange
History files don't relieve the operator from COPYING the exchange. They
MAY relieve the operator from TYPING the exchange if what he copies matches
what the history file pre-fills for him.
73,
Ed - W0YK
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer, Scott Robbins |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer -- a "worthless" solution, Tod -ID |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer, k3bu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer, steve . root |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |