CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Announcing 2009 CQWW 160 contest

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Announcing 2009 CQWW 160 contest
From: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Reply-to: k1ttt@arrl.net
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:33:15 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I'll agree with that, whats the purpose of limiting multi-op??  whats the
daytime operator supposed to do now??


David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-
> bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of David Kopacz
> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 04:24
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Cc: Topband@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Announcing 2009 CQWW 160 contest
> 
> "5. A 40-hour maximum operating period has been added for multi-op
> entries."
> 
> Andy,
> 
> I am not certain I understand this rule at all. I have never operated a
> 160 contest, but it seems to me one would be lucky to get 40 hours of
> time on that band.
> 
> Besides, even if the band was open for 40 hours, why would there be a
> maximum operating time for multi-ops? It seems that multiple operators
> would want to operate the entire contest so everyone maximizes their on
> air time and fun. Otherwise, why bother operating multi-op at all?
> 
> What am I missing here?
> 
> David ~ KY1V
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>