Sleep?? :)
W1MD
---- David Robbins K1TTT <k1ttt@arrl.net> wrote:
> I'll agree with that, whats the purpose of limiting multi-op?? whats the
> daytime operator supposed to do now??
>
>
> David Robbins K1TTT
> e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
> web: http://www.k1ttt.net
> AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-
> > bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of David Kopacz
> > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 04:24
> > To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> > Cc: Topband@contesting.com
> > Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Announcing 2009 CQWW 160 contest
> >
> > "5. A 40-hour maximum operating period has been added for multi-op
> > entries."
> >
> > Andy,
> >
> > I am not certain I understand this rule at all. I have never operated a
> > 160 contest, but it seems to me one would be lucky to get 40 hours of
> > time on that band.
> >
> > Besides, even if the band was open for 40 hours, why would there be a
> > maximum operating time for multi-ops? It seems that multiple operators
> > would want to operate the entire contest so everyone maximizes their on
> > air time and fun. Otherwise, why bother operating multi-op at all?
> >
> > What am I missing here?
> >
> > David ~ KY1V
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|