The big difference here...if you're logging during the contest you get that one
opportunity at getting the information down right. If you use a recording, you
could listen to the same QSO 17 times until you think you have it right. That's
why it's unethical in my book.
73 Steve K0SR
-----Original Message-----
From: kr2q@optimum.net [mailto:kr2q@optimum.net]
Sent: Monday, December 8, 2008 05:20 AM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] self help during contest
N7DF said, [snip] For that matter, why should an activity that involves only
yourself not be acceptable? In other words, why can't you record the contest
operation and use your recording, after the contest is over, to check the
accuracy of your log? You are not creating new QSOs, only corrrecting ones that
have already been made. [end snip] Here is my two cents with the usual
disclaimer (ie, this is MY opinion and should not be construed as anything
official from any contest committee with which I may be associated). The
contest period is the defined time frame where your effort as a contester is
being judged. This includes accurately logging QSOs during the heat of the
battle. The heat of the battle is one of the few areas where the playing field
is sort of level. We are all tired; we all suffer from QRM and maybe QRN and we
all make mistakes for various reasons. As the contest progresses, we get more
tired and may be prone to make more mistakes. If you "double check" your w
ork after the contest with the use of a recording, well, then you are
artificially extending the period of competition. You're giving yourself a 2nd
shot at getting it right, AFTER the contest is OVER. Analogy: You are taking an
exam at university. It is a timed exam and you have one hour. When the exam is
over, you decide that you would like to "review" your answers and, you discover
that, because of STRESS during the exam, one or more is/are wrong because you
filled in the "wrong" circle on the exam answer sheet. Should you be justified
in correcting it? Does this sound legit? Not to me. History: Once upon a time,
a happy and famous Finn decided that he would record the entire contest and NOT
LOG ANYTHING during the contest; he would simply do that "chore" later. After
all, all he was doing was listening to himself make QSOs. Additionally, if he
discovered any mistakes he made in responding during the QSO, he could simply
NOW log the correct information. It really was NOT
a correction because there was no original LOG (unless you consider a
recording equal to the log). For me (yes, this is still all MY opinion), this
potentially gave him a huge advantage...not only in terms of accuracy, but in
terms of MUCH LESS STRESS during the contest period. Don't think logging
accurately DURING the contest is stressful? Think again. I remember when
"cruise control" first came out. Gosh...wasn't that silly. How hard is it to
keep your foot on the accelerator? Well, on a long trip (analogy = contest
period) one discovers that not having to keep your foot on the pedal is a BIG
stress reliever. It lets you concentrate much more on other things. At least it
does for me (YMMV). So...what about listening DURING the contest (in a contest
such as 160 where there is so much dead time). For me, this is easy. It is
still DURING the contest. If you choose to use your time for reviewing (and
potentially correcting) your log instead of getting sleep or relaxation, then
that is your choice; perfectly legal. Try that same thing AFTER the contest?
Nope...the contest is OVER. Put down your pencils. By the way, when you review
your log after the contest, you are, in effect, adjudicating your own log.
Adjudication is the role of the contest sponsor, NOT the entrant. Can you
imagine taking a spelling exam and then after the exam, consulting a dictionary
to "correct" the errors? Is it in the rules? Not exactly. Here is what it says
in the CQWW Handbook, 1994 Edition on page 45, Item #10, sub-item 1. [snip] 1.
Can I change a call sign in my log after the contest is over? No. All you can
do is remove bad calls and duplicates. [end snip] Of course today, no contest
sponsor wants you to remove duplicates from your log and I would wager that
nobody wants you to remove a BAD call from your log either (as opposed to
fixing a typographical error such as "KP2A08" in CQWW, all entered into the
CALLSIGN field of your logging program ). End of my 2 cents....
.Hope this helps. de Doug KR2Q _______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|