To: | "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] An Examination of K1TTT's Reports |
From: | "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com> |
Date: | Sat, 14 Mar 2009 15:51:47 -0500 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> > You could say that K1TTT is an "OO" (Official Observer) or "policeman of > sorts" in the context of contesting. > OO's don't issue public reports. They issue private notices. In extreme cases they involve the regulators. I think everyone (or at least most of us) think that K1TTT's investigations would be useful if they were privately handled (and in appropriate cases sent to the contest sponsor), but his public jeremiads displays are distasteful to reasonable people. 73, de Hans, K0HB/W7 _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Meta-debate, David Kopacz |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] Sprint Rules Question, W0MU Mike Fatchett |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] An Examination of K1TTT's Reports, Robert Naumann |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] An Examination of K1TTT's Reports, Eric Hilding |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |