CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories

To: n3bb@mindspring.com, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories
From: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:09:24 EDT
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I agree with N3BB on this one, and further think that remote receivers  
should not be allowed outside either one's zone or country, i.e. no USA east  
coast stations with west coast receivers. Otherwise it will be a huge 
advantage  for people in places like UA0 vs., say, UN.
 
This concept smells even worse as remote receiver usage becomes  common.  
What point is served if EI5DI uses his remote 160 meter  receiver in Chicago 
to hear me, while I am using my remote 160 meter receiver in  Frankfort to 
hear him?
 
I do look forward, however, to having lots of remotely operated stations  
with both receivers and transmitters located in rare DX locations where 
travel  thereto is a major impediment to their being active.
 
 
 
73  -  Jim   K8MR
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 6/16/2009 5:19:57 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
n3bb@mindspring.com writes:

As much  as I respect CQ Magazine and their support of contesting, and the  
experienced and knowledgeable hams on the CQ CAC, I believe they have made  
a serious mistake with the new Xtreme categories. The worst error is  
allowing remote receiving antennas to be placed outside of the DXCC  
entity. 
That means we will have remote receiving locations available  worldwide for 
some participants, some available through friendships,  others from 
"rent-a-receiver" arrangements. Please explain to me the value  of a 
contester who has a transmit location, either under his ownership or  under 
a "rent-a-tower" deal in his DXCC entity, is connected through the  
Internet 
to his radios, and thus is able to send a strong signal into  another 
continent where he also has a "rent-a-receiver." It will become  common 
for  North Americans and Europeans to start to work multiple  thousands of 
contest contacts in the other ham-rich continent in addition  to their own. 
Within five years, these stations will "rack up" three or  four of even 
five 
thousand contacts on each band with the number of  multipliers skyrocketing 
as well. Does this excite you as to the future of  one-sixty and eighty 
meter numbers? Not me.

Is the future of  "leading edge"contesting this, along with the 
machine-to-machine automatic  QSOs which soon will be routine from the 
mushrooming Skimmer-equipped  stations. Watch for this software to be the 
next hot item!

Some  might be pleased with this. This "boy and his radio" is not.

Jim  George
N3BB




**************Download the AOL Classifieds Toolbar for local deals at your 
fingertips. 
(http://toolbar.aol.com/aolclassifieds/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown00000004)
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>