CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections

To: cq contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections
From: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:58:54 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
So, since relying on "honesty and integrity" has proven to be 
insufficient, it's the threat of an inspection to keep people playing by 
the rules, or else we just give up.

I vote for the threat of inspections - I've seen too many amplifier 
reviews by contesters bragging over how much power (way over their 
country's legal limit) their amp was running in the contests.

Doubtless, if someone feels wronged, they can retain a cq-contest-lawyer 
to represent them to the CQ Contest Committee and plead their case.   :-)

73,
Steve
NN4X
EL98jh


Warren C. Stankiewicz wrote:
 >
 > Ah, I can see it now...
 >
 > The next big trend in contest stations will be "Hiding Places" ....

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>