CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Do We ever need this?

To: <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Do We ever need this?
From: "Mike N0HI" <mike@n0hi.net>
Reply-to: Mike N0HI <mike@n0hi.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:26:16 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I have to believe this is fancy English.  I can't imagine they expect every 
single entrant to be making announcements prior to the contest.  Sounds like 
disclaimer language to me.

--
Mike DeChristopher, N0HI
http://www.n0hi.net
telnet://cluster.n0hi.net



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Lott" <lottsphoto@gmail.com>
To: "Gediminas Lucinskas" <LY3BA@takas.lt>
Cc: "CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 7:21 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Do We ever need this?


> *We expect contesters announcing somewhere their Contest plans in advance,
> especially those intending to operate Low Power, QRPp, claiming 
> unassisted.*
>
> I understand that to me on DX bulletins and/or other News sites
> like Radio-Sport.net , the ARRL Contest Reflector written by N0AX and even
> your own website or Blog etc
>
> 73
> kg5vk
> steve
> www.sdxa.blogspot.com
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Gediminas Lucinskas <LY3BA@takas.lt> 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> When We read recent CQ WW DX Contest rules changes, e.g.
>>
>> "8. A competitor who wishes to be
>> judged for a top score in their category
>> must agree to a potential visitation at any
>> time during the contest by an observer
>> appointed by the CQ WW Contest Committee.
>> Failure of the entrant to respond
>> to our correspondence or to allow an
>> observer full access to the contest QTH
>> may result in the competitor being removed
>> from award eligibility for 3 years.",
>>
>> We expect contesters announcing somewhere their Contest plans in advance,
>> especially those intending to operate Low Power, QRPp, claiming 
>> unassisted.
>> Folowing this logic I did try to announce my plans for the nearest CQ WW 
>> DX
>> on the Bill's, NG3K WEB http://www.ng3k.com/Misc/cqs2009.html last week.
>> Only few days later I discovered that this WEB
>> http://www.ng3k.com/Contest/consub.html is created only for the 
>> announcing
>> some sort of DX operations in the Contest, DX'peditions. We can see
>> following words on the Bill's WEB:
>> "Sorry, but for the most part I can't include SO operations from the more
>> common entities, except in the case of unusual call signs, rarer zones 
>> (e.g.
>> CQ zones 02, 19, 23, 29), or other factors likely, in my judgment, to be 
>> of
>> interest to the Contest/DX community. To do so would overwhelm the lists
>> with items of little interest to most users and would make list 
>> maintenance
>> too time consuming for me. I hope you will understand."
>>
>> So, I wonder how Contest Committee will know about someones "wishes to be
>> judged for a top score in their category"?
>> I don't see any request in the rules to inform Committee or Contest
>> community about these wishes, I can't find right place on the WEB where
>> contesters may share their contest plans. Do We ever need this?
>> Perhaps I'm missing something?
>>
>> 73! Gedas, LY9A  SO AB LP Unassisted in CQ WW DX SSB 2009
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>