To: | CQ-Contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] A couple of post-CQWW observations |
From: | Tad Danley <tdanley@suddenlink.net> |
Reply-to: | tdanley@suddenlink.net |
Date: | Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:40:43 -0500 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: > > Pet peeve: > > QRZ <dx call> > "AD1C" > AD1C 59 <zone> > "Thanks 5904" > <dx call> > > So I did work him or not? Did he lose my puny signal in the > QRM/QRM/QSB? Please say SOMETHING besides just your call. One > station repeated the zone back to everyone. Many stations I worked repeated my zone back to me - very comforting especially due to my 100 watts to a low antenna, also in a zone that doesn't match my call. 73, -- Tad Danley, K3TD _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting? NEVER!, Jim Reisert AD1C |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Live Scores, K1TTT |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] A couple of post-CQWW observations, David Levine |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] A couple of post-CQWW observations, PD2R |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |