CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] A couple of post-CQWW observations

To: CQ-Contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] A couple of post-CQWW observations
From: Tad Danley <tdanley@suddenlink.net>
Reply-to: tdanley@suddenlink.net
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:40:43 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:
> 
> Pet peeve:
> 
>     QRZ <dx call>
>     "AD1C"
>     AD1C 59 <zone>
>     "Thanks 5904"
>     <dx call>
> 
> So I did work him or not?  Did he lose my puny signal in the
> QRM/QRM/QSB?  Please say SOMETHING besides just your call.  One
> station repeated the zone back to everyone.


Many stations I worked repeated my zone back to me - very comforting 
especially due to my 100 watts to a low antenna, also in a zone that 
doesn't match my call.

73,

-- 
Tad Danley, K3TD



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>