CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting

To: cq-contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting
From: "hank.k8dd" <hank.k8dd@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:20:14 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Tree <tree@kkn.net> wrote:
>
> However, I can think of a situation where self spotting might be a good
> thing.  I was reading VE8EV's 3830 post after the SSB Sweepstakes last
> year and caught this comment:
>
> "Finally we got spotted and then the rate jumped from 0 to 100 in the
> blink of an eye."
>
> Wow.  That's a big change.  Probably when the pileup started - it
> attracted enough attention that even those not on packet knew something
> was up.  If someone is off in a weird direction and isn't able to attract
> attention with their small signal - having a spot certainly enables them
> to start making QSOs.
>
> I wouldn't think someone from VE8 is likely to be a top ten score and
> the reason they are on the air is to give people a clean sweep.  Is this
> a case where a self spot or two wouldn't be  bad thing?
>
> 73 Tree N6TR


I've experienced that several times from Central & South America where
the rate meter jumped from 0 to 100 .... more realistically from maybe 20 to
150 or so in 30 seconds due to "hitting the cluster".  But I really
don't think that
justifies self spotting.
But then we were well up in the top 10 in our class.

73    Hank    K8DD
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>