CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] anti-contest petition MMSN

To: <nn3w@cox.net>, <wn3vaw@verizon.net>, <david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] anti-contest petition MMSN
From: Scott Currier <scott_currier@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 16:00:09 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

It will be interesting to see what they get for signatures. Contesters tend to 
be active and they also spend money. Two attributes that will make it very much 
an uphill battle for the net to achieve it's goal of having some spectrum set 
aside. 

An event with participation levels as high as a major contest will be difficult 
to beat. 

I think it is going to come down to them either adapting and learning how to 
co-exist with contests or eternal complaining. 

There is no evidence that this 10 hour a day net on 14.300 is a good use of 
spectrum. They're not the only ones or even the best ones to handle emergency 
traffic. 

However, contests are good for the hobby, they encourage people to put what 
they have learned into practice and to spend money building better stations. 
The contests are short lived and normally are restricted to a single mode and 
they are not on all of the HF bands. They do inconvenience a few people but so 
does this net. 

73 and good contesting. 

Scott Currier
KT1B
Haverhill, MA























> From: nn3w@cox.net
> To: wn3vaw@verizon.net; david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com; 
> cq-contest@contesting.com
> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 00:08:21 -0500
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] anti-contest petition MMSN
> 
> Remember, this is not a petition to the FCC.  This seems like an open ended 
> petition directed at contest sponsors (e.g., the ARRL and CQ).
> 
> Mind you, that the petition would eventually like to influence national 
> level clubs - i.e., DARC, RSGB, RAC, ARRL, etc.
> 
> There is where the real problem is - as was aptly demonstrated this past 
> summer involving the WAE contests..
> 
> 73 Rich NN3W
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
> To: "'David Kopacz'" <david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com>; 
> <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 7:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] anti-contest petition MMSN
> 
> 
> > Here's the funny thing.
> >
> > Let's suppose the FCC gives the MMSN guys what they want.
> >
> > What's to stop contesters outside of FCC jurisdiction from operating just 
> > as
> > they do now, including operating near or on the MMSN frequency?  Nothing.
> >
> > On that basis alone, the FCC should reject the petition as unrealistic.
> >
> > 73, ron w3wn
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Get gifts for them and cashback for you. Try Bing now.
http://www.bing.com/shopping/search?q=xbox+games&scope=cashback&form=MSHYCB&publ=WLHMTAG&crea=TEXT_MSHYCB_Shopping_Giftsforthem_cashback_1x1
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>