CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules?

To: David Kopacz <david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules?
From: Luc PY8AZT <py8azt@dxbrasil.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 20:17:20 -0300
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
2009/12/4 David Kopacz <david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com>:
> What's wrong with this picture?
>
> EF8M(RD3AF)       7374   131   409    48 11,888,100
> V47NT(N2NT)       7402   135   457    48 11,231,424
>

Nothing is wrong. N2NT should do better (I mean more mults) as he did
it in 2006:
Total: 7189   154      491  Total Score = 12,009,900

We are all crying like babies without his mom, because lacking
propagation. What we really need is some sunspots.
After that, no cries any more, no "please, change the rules, I want to
play outside".

-- 
73, Luc
__
ZY7C Team member
PT7AG (also PY8AZT, PX8C, ZZ8Z)
LABRE, ARRL, Uirapuru DX Club & ADXG Member
__
Participe da Lista DXBrasil: dxbrasil+subscribe@googlegroups.com
__
Website: http://www.dxbrasil.net
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>