Anamolies like this are inevitable with a continent-based scoring system. I
think the only way to fix it is to use a scheme based on actual distance,
such as one QSO point per 1000 kilometers of distance, or something similar.
It would be relatively simple to implement such a system with today's
computer-based logging and log-checking programs.
73, Dick WC1M
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Kopacz [mailto:david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 12:33 PM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules?
>
> What's wrong with this picture?
>
> EF8M(RD3AF) 7374 131 409 48 11,888,100
> V47NT(N2NT) 7402 135 457 48 11,231,424
>
> Let's see, V47NT has more Q's more zones and significantly more
> countries, but a lower score!
>
> So basically, he out-performed EF8M in all aspects and still loses.
>
> I think it's time for an evaluation of the scoring rules.
>
> What do you think?
>
> David ~ KY1V
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|