To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules? |
From: | "David Kopacz" <david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com> |
Date: | Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:32:39 -0600 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
What's wrong with this picture? EF8M(RD3AF) 7374 131 409 48 11,888,100 V47NT(N2NT) 7402 135 457 48 11,231,424 Let's see, V47NT has more Q's more zones and significantly more countries, but a lower score! So basically, he out-performed EF8M in all aspects and still loses. I think it's time for an evaluation of the scoring rules. What do you think? David ~ KY1V _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX M/S Rule, Gerry Lynch |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] MMSN and keeping 14.300 clear, John |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Announcing: NCCC-Sprint (NS) Ladder - Winter Edition, Bill Haddon |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules?, Luc PY8AZT |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |