| To: | "CQ-Contest" <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>, "N2IC Steve" <n2ic@arrl.net>, "K5ZD Thompson" <k5zd@charter.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW? |
| From: | "Colleen Brakob" <cbrakob@gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | Colleen Brakob <cbrakob@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:28:25 -0600 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
It remains a complete mystery to me why it is improper for me DURING THE CONTEST to call " CQ RI" or "CQ NT" as a single operator, but perfectly proper to use crutches like "super check partial" which is a database compiled from the efforts of OTHER OPERATORS. My directional CQ is "scorned", but assistance compiled by K5ZD from the logs of other operators is acceptable? Good luck on this one now! 73, de Hans, K0HB "Just a boy and his radio" _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] NS Ladder -- Haiti EQ, Bill Haddon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Leave some room this weekend, Radio K0HB |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW?, W0MU Mike Fatchett |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW?, K4RO Kirk Pickering |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |