And make Campbell, CA a mult also. I'd really like to be on the "chased" side
of things for a change...
Jack Brindle, W6FB
On Dec 24, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Richard F DiDonna NN3W wrote:
> Good choice. While we're at it, how about adding Washington, D.C. as a
> multiplier? ARRL DX, ARRL 10, CQ 160, and others all do it. Plus, its not
> as if there is no activity from DC. Indeed, there were either 7 or 8
> stations on from DC for the ARRL 10...
>
> 73 and merry Christmas...
>
> Rich NN3W
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bruce Horn" <bhorn@hornucopia.com>
> To: "cq-contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Sent: Friday, December 24, 2010 12:50 PM
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules
>
>
>> Although the nature of contesting has been one of technological advances
>> over the years that have increased scoring opportunities, it's evident
>> from the postings on this list that the contesting community is not ready
>> to adopt CW Skimmer-like technologies in the single-op category at this
>> time. For this reason and the fact that the CW NAQP contest will be used
>> as part of the team selection criteria for WRTC 2014 starting in 2011,
>> we've returned the single-op criteria to the pre-2009 definition that
>> prohibits the use of automated tools. The rules on the NCJ web site have
>> been updated to reflect this change.
>>
>> 73 de Bruce, WA7BNM (bhorn@hornucopia.com)
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|